Application and advantages of a joystick-controlled robotic scope holder in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: a comparative study.

Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy has gained popularity due to its scarless nature, but the use of a handheld endoscope can lead to an unstable visual field. Soloassist II, a robotic scope holder, enables precise control using a joystick, ensuring stable vision. This study aims to evaluate the application and the advantages of Soloassist II in transoral thyroidectomy. Patients who underwent transoral thyroidectomy with Soloassist II or human assistance between June 2019 and May 2021 were reviewed. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes were compared. The ergonomic stress of the assistant in both groups was also measured. A total of 100 consecutive patients were included: 32 were assisted by Soloassist II and 68 by humans. The Soloassist II group demonstrated significantly shorter operation times (median [IQR]) (165 [149,179] vs. 181 [165,204] min, P = 0.004) in unilateral lobectomy and less blood loss (median [IQR]) (2 [2,2] vs. 2 [2,3] ml, P = 0.002) than the human-assisted group. Postoperative course and complication rates were similar. The musculoskeletal pain of the assistant was significantly higher and involved more areas in the human-assisted group. The utilization of Soloassist II in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy is easy to set up and leads to shorter operation times, reduced blood loss, and decreased musculoskeletal pain compared to human handheld endoscope. These findings support the potential of Soloassist II in improving surgical outcomes and minimizing physical strain during transoral thyroidectomy.

Surgical intervention may provides better outcomes for hip fracture in nonagenarian patients: A retrospective observational study.

Background: Hip fracture is a common disease in the elderly. Among these patients, surgical intervention for hip fracture should be carefully considered because of old age and multiple comorbidities. There are still insufficient comparisons between nonagenarian patients treated with surgery and those treated non-surgically. We studied hip fracture nonagenarian patients to compare the different outcomes between surgical and non-surgical treatments. Materials and methods: Nonagenarian patients visiting the emergency department with hip fractures between March 2010 and December 2020 were identified. Overall survival was estimated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. The mortality rates, the length of hospital stay, complication and readmission rates were also recorded. Results: A total of 173 patients who underwent surgery and 32 who received conservative treatments were included. The median survival time was 58.47 months in the OP group, which was significantly higher than the 24.28 months in the non-OP group. After adjusting for covariates, including age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), injury severity score, and fracture type, the risk of death was reduced by surgery (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.427; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.207-0.882; p = 0.021). CCI was also an independent risk factor for poor survival rate (HR = 1.3; 95 % CI: 1.115-1.515; p = 0.001). After adjusting for several factors, surgery within 48 h improved overall survival (HR: 2.518; 95 % CI: 1.299-4.879; p = 0.006) in operative group. Conclusion: Our study suggests that surgical treatment may provide better survival for nonagenarian patients with hip fractures than non-operation, especially patients with less concurrent comorbidities.

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Transoral Versus Open Thyroidectomy for Graves Disease.

INTRODUCTION: The transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) is a safe alternative to thyroidectomy for thyroid goiter and provides the benefit of being scarless. However, the data on the use of TOETVA in patients with Graves disease are limited. This retrospective study compared the outcomes of Graves disease patients who underwent TOETVA versus those who underwent open thyroidectomy (OT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with Graves disease who received TOETVA or OT for bilateral total thyroidectomy between September 2017 and October 2022 were included. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes, including operation time, blood loss, length of stay, and complications, were compared. RESULTS: There were 15 patients in each group. The mean age in the TOETVA group was 35.80±8.13 years, which was significantly younger than that in the OT group, which was 51.53±14.22 years. Females predominated in both groups. The other demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were also comparable. The postoperative stay and complications, including hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, surgical site infection, postoperative hemorrhage, and recurrence of hyperthyroidism, were not different between the 2 groups. There were 11 patients in the TOETVA group and 10 in the OT group who had thyroglobulin levels <0.1 ng/dL, indicating the completeness of total thyroidectomy in the 2 groups. There was no conversion of TOETVA to an open procedure. CONCLUSIONS: For carefully selected Graves patients, TOETVA offers a safe, scarless, and feasible alternative to conventional open thyroidectomy.

Transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: the mid-term oncological outcome.

BACKGROUND: Traditional open thyroidectomy is the surgical standard for thyroid cancer; however, it inevitably leaves a visible scar on the neck and affects the patient's quality of life. Therefore, to avoid making a neck incision, the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) have been developed recently, and the surgical outcomes of these techniques are as favorable as open surgery for benign disease. Additionally, positive short-term surgical outcomes have also been achieved in a few patients with thyroid cancer. However, no data on the mid-to-long-term recurrence and survival rates of transoral thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer are available. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the surgical outcomes and mid-term oncological results of the TOETVA and TORT in patients with thyroid cancer. METHODS: We reviewed patients who had received TOETVA or TORT between July 2017 and November 2021 and followed up on their oncological outcomes until December 2022. Perioperative surgical and mid-term oncological outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The 115 patients underwent 122 operations (57 TOETVAs and 65 TORTs), including seven complete thyroidectomies for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), Stage I-II, including T1-T3, N0-N1a, and initial low- to high-risk groups. There was no conversion from transoral to open surgery. TORT required a longer operating time (median [interquartile range]) than TOETVA (lobectomy: 279 [250, 318] vs. 196 [173, 253] min, p < 0.001; bilateral total thyroidectomy: 375 [309, 433] vs. 279 [238, 312] min, p < 0.001); however, no difference was found between the two groups regarding perioperative complications. Complete thyroidectomy with a second transoral approach was safe. TOETVA and TORT achieved favorable oncological outcomes with 100% survival and 98.2% acceptable response (excellent and indeterminate response) during a mean 37.88 ± 12.42 months mid-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy was safe and achieved favorable mid-term oncological outcomes in a selected cohort of patients with early-stage DTC.

Partial Versus Total Omentectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Surgical treatment is the key to cure localized gastric cancer. There is no strong evidence that supports the value of omentectomy. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and efficiency of partial and total omentectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. All studies that compared total and partial omentectomy as treatments for gastric cancer were included. The primary outcomes were patients' overall survival and disease-free survival, while the secondary outcomes were perioperative outcome and postoperative complications. Results: A total of nine studies were examined, wherein 1043 patients were included in the partial omentectomy group, and 1995 in the total omentectomy group. The partial omentectomy group was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.98, p = 0.04, I2 = 0%), shorter operative time, and lesser blood loss than the total omentectomy group. In addition, no statistically significant difference was observed in the number of dissected lymph nodes, length of hospital stays, complication rate, and disease-free survival. Conclusions: Our results show that, compared with total omentectomy in gastric cancer surgery, partial omentectomy had non-inferior oncological outcomes and comparable safety outcomes.

Survival after multiple nail gun injuries to the brain, lung, and heart: a case report and a review of the literature.

Most nail gun injuries involve the extremities and result from work-related accidents. Injuries to the brain or thorax are relatively rare, and cases with injuries to both regions are even rarer and often lethal. Initial evaluation, resuscitation, and surgical planning can be challenging for emergency physicians and surgeons. We present the details of a man with multiple nail gun injuries to the brain, lung, and heart following a suicide attempt. The patient presented to the emergency department in shock. After immediate resuscitation, emergent sternotomy, and subsequent craniotomy, he was discharged without significant morbidity. According to the literature, this is the only reported case involving multiple nail gun injuries to the brain, lungs, and heart. The mortality rate of multiple nail gun injuries involving the head and chest is approximately 20%. Rapid evaluation, immediate resuscitation, and appropriate imaging and surgery are crucial for increasing survival and achieving a good prognosis. Emergency sternotomy for cardiac injury is the foremost priority, and the timing of craniotomy depends on the patient's vital sign status and whether brain injury is evident.A preprint of this article is available online: DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-35448/v1.